Michael Vieth

589 citations
20 papers · 486 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Vieth

19 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Michael Vieth
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 381
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 194
  • Condensed Matter Physics 94
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 233
  • Materials Chemistry 134
Replace Ivan Petej with:
Ivan Petej France
C. Beigné France
Elisa De Ranieri United Kingdom
José V. Anguita Spain
Jinyu Deng Singapore
Alexander Hassdenteufel Germany
Stephane Zoll France
Rashid R. Gareev Germany
Mingyue Wang United Kingdom
Michael Vieth relative to Ivan Petej France Ivan Petej's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ivan Petej · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Vieth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Vieth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Vieth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Vieth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Vieth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Vieth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Vieth. The network helps show where Michael Vieth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Vieth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Vieth Line = papers co-authored together Michael Vieth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1996111
2 199780
3 200859
4 200942
5 200129
6 200028
7 199922
8 200219
9 199718
10 200516
11 200012
12 199011
13 20149
14 19988
15 19886
16 20045
17 20045
18 20032
19 19942
20 19942

About Michael Vieth

Michael Vieth is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (17 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (8 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (7 papers), ZnO doping and properties (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (4 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (2 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (381 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (194 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (94 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (233 citations) and Materials Chemistry (134 citations). Michael Vieth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Guenther Gieres, Holger Berg, G. Rupp, Wolfgang Clemens, Joachim Wecker, Manfred Rührig, Stephane Zoll, Heinz von Seggern, Wiebke Sarfert and G.U. Reiß-. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review B, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact