Andreas T. Schmidt
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 15
- Philosophy 10
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 9
- Co-authors
- Bart Engelen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Moral Philosophy (3 papers)Ethics (3 papers)Philosophy & Public Affairs (2 papers)Utilitas (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andreas T. Schmidt
23 papers receiving 374 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- General Decision Sciences 52
- Applied Psychology 33
- Philosophy 52
- Safety Research 39
- Cognitive Neuroscience 82
Countries citing papers authored by Andreas T. Schmidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas T. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas T. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas T. Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas T. Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas T. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas T. Schmidt. The network helps show where Andreas T. Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Andreas T. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 153 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 6 | The Little Known Story of De-Proliferation: Why States Give Up Nuclear Weapons Activities | 2008 | 14 |
| 7 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 1 |
About Andreas T. Schmidt
Andreas T. Schmidt is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (15 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (9 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (2 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (52 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations), Philosophy (52 citations), Safety Research (39 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (82 citations). Andreas T. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bart Engelen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Moral Philosophy, Ethics, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Utilitas and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.