Li-En Jao
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Papers in
-
- RNA Research and Splicing 5
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 5
- RNA modifications and cancer 3
- Nuclear Structure and Function 2
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 2
-
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 2
- Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Susan R. Wente (4 shared papers)Wenbiao Chen (2 shared papers)Shawn M. Burgess (3 shared papers)Bruce Appel (1 shared paper)Linlin Yin (1 shared paper)Abdalla Akef (1 shared paper)Ingrid Brust‐Mascher (2 shared papers)Bo Zhang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- eLife (2 papers)Development (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Molecular Biology of the Cell (1 paper)Human Molecular Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Li-En Jao
14 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Li-En Jao's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Aging 65
- Cell Biology 422
- Business and International Management 38
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Genetics 268
Countries citing papers authored by Li-En Jao
This map shows the geographic impact of Li-En Jao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li-En Jao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li-En Jao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Li-En Jao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li-En Jao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li-En Jao. The network helps show where Li-En Jao may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li-En Jao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 941 |
| 2 | 2014 | 101 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 85 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 |
About Li-En Jao
Li-En Jao is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Genetics, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (2 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (65 citations), Cell Biology (422 citations), Business and International Management (38 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations) and Genetics (268 citations). Li-En Jao has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Susan R. Wente, Wenbiao Chen, Shawn M. Burgess, Bruce Appel, Linlin Yin, Abdalla Akef, Ingrid Brust‐Mascher, Bo Zhang, Dongmei Wang and Shuo Lin. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Biology of the Cell and Human Molecular Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.