John Goodwin

52 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

John Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Applied Psychology 54
  • Clinical Psychology 201
  • Social Psychology 154
  • General Health Professions 102
Replace Gillie Bolton with:
Gillie Bolton United Kingdom
Robin Shohet United Kingdom
Kwisoon Choe South Korea
Ada Hui United Kingdom
Ginette G. Ferszt United States
Christine Jonas‐Simpson Canada
Audhild Løhre Norway
Carey Denholm Australia
Graham McCaffrey Canada
Keren Michael Israel
John Goodwin relative to Gillie Bolton United Kingdom Gillie Bolton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Gillie Bolton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Goodwin. The network helps show where John Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together John Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201670
2 201659
3 201840
4 201633
5 202132
6 202032
7 202126
8 201923
9 201921
10 202221
11
Concise dictionary of the Christian world mission
197119
12 201316
13 202114
14 201914
15 201313
16 202311
17 201811
18 202311
19 201211
20 202110

About John Goodwin

John Goodwin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Health Information Management, having authored 67 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Film in Education and Therapy (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers) and Nursing education and management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (12 citations), Applied Psychology (54 citations), Clinical Psychology (201 citations), Social Psychology (154 citations) and General Health Professions (102 citations). John Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Laura Behan, Áine Horgan, Caroline Kilty, Eileen Savage, Mohamad M. Saab, Áine O’Donovan, Sinead M. O’Brien, Karen McCarthy, Elaine Meehan and Stephen Bradley. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Teaching and learning in nursing, Journal of Mental Health, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being and Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact