Lanlin Ding

21 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Lanlin Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Dermatology 66
  • Epidemiology 119
  • Health 22
  • Neurology 22
  • Small Animals 19
Replace Zachary Hopkins with:
Zachary Hopkins United States
Hsuan‐Hsiang Chen Taiwan
João Amado Portugal
Mary K. Tripp United States
Henrik Thoning Denmark
Ayşe Özaydın Türkiye
Charles O’Donovan United Kingdom
Vivian Graham United States
Emily C. Milam United States
Ximena Díaz Chile
Lanlin Ding relative to Zachary Hopkins United States Zachary Hopkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Zachary Hopkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lanlin Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lanlin Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lanlin Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lanlin Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lanlin Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lanlin Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lanlin Ding. The network helps show where Lanlin Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lanlin Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lanlin Ding Line = papers co-authored together Lanlin Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002149
2 202339
3 201821
4 201921
5 202320
6 202116
7 202115
8 202214
9 20195
10 20213
11 20243
12 20193
13
Court Judgment Decision Support System Based on Medical Text Mining
20172
14 20202
15 20242
16 20182
17 20241
18 20231
19 20211
20 20201

About Lanlin Ding

Lanlin Ding is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, General Energy, Finance and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Global Health Care Issues (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers), Global Energy Security and Policy (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (2 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (66 citations), Epidemiology (119 citations), Health (22 citations), Neurology (22 citations) and Small Animals (19 citations). Lanlin Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peng Nie, Wolfram Sterry, Kara L. Andres, Anita Takwale, Thomas Ruzicka, Monique R.T.M. Thissen, Jens Bichel, Alfonso Sousa‐Poza, Hao Hu and Han He. Their work appears in journals such as The journal of nutrition health & aging, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Economics & Human Biology, BMC Public Health and China Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact