Economics & Human Biology

1.2k papers and 25.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Economics & Human Biology in the last decades have received a total of 25.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Economics & Human Biology usually cover General Health Professions (385 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (292 papers) and Health (285 papers) specifically the topics of Health disparities and outcomes (268 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (259 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (206 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economics & Human Biology are Tim Cole, John Cawley, Ulf‐G. Gerdtham, Christopher J. Ruhm, John Komlos, Hans de Beer, Climent Quintana‐Domeque, Marco Sunder, Lisa M. Powell and Jay Zagorsky.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economics & Human Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economics & Human Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economics & Human Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Economics & Human Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economics & Human Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economics & Human Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economics & Human Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025