China Economic Review

2.1k papers and 63.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in China Economic Review in the last decades have received a total of 63.9k indexed citations. Papers published in China Economic Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.2k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (472 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (439 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (319 papers), Global trade and economics (310 papers) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (243 papers). The most active scholars publishing in China Economic Review are Yiping Huang, Shunfeng Song, Xiaobo Zhang, Scott Rozelle, Jikun Huang, Shi Li, John Knight, Thomas G. Rawski, Yang Song and Carsten A. Holz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in China Economic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in China Economic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in China Economic Review.

Countries where authors publish in China Economic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in China Economic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in China Economic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Economic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025