Lamar Pierce

44 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Lamar Pierce
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Safety Research 567
  • Information Systems and Management 477
  • General Decision Sciences 93
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 449
  • Strategy and Management 513
Replace Madan M. Pillutla with:
Madan M. Pillutla United Kingdom
Nancy R. Buchan United States
Xiao-Ping Chen United States
Geoffrey B. Sprinkle United States
Leigh Plunkett Tost United States
Peter H. Kim United States
Marius van Dijke Netherlands
Lisa D. Ordóñez United States
Bruce Barry United States
Dane K. Peterson United States
Lamar Pierce relative to Madan M. Pillutla United Kingdom Madan M. Pillutla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Madan M. Pillutla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lamar Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lamar Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lamar Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lamar Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lamar Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lamar Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lamar Pierce. The network helps show where Lamar Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lamar Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lamar Pierce Line = papers co-authored together Lamar Pierce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009227
2 2009227
3 2012176
4 2015164
5 2008139
6 2017137
7 2016127
8 2013123
9 2010120
10 2014114
11 201092
12 200883
13 201781
14 201477
15 201257
16 201355
17 201948
18 201747
19 201543
20 201840

About Lamar Pierce

Lamar Pierce is a scholar working on Safety Research, Information Systems and Management, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 45 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (18 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (6 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (567 citations), Information Systems and Management (477 citations), General Decision Sciences (93 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (449 citations) and Strategy and Management (513 citations). Lamar Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Francesca Gino, Ian Larkin, Jason A. Snyder, Timothy Gubler, Tat Y. Chan, Daniel C. Snow, Victor Manuel Bennett, Andrew P. McAfee, Felix F. Arndt and Michael S. Dahl. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Organization Science, Strategic Management Journal, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact