Lamar Pierce

71 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Lamar Pierce
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Safety Research 795
  • Information Systems and Management 636
  • General Decision Sciences 120
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 554
  • Strategy and Management 679
Replace Madan M. Pillutla with:
Madan M. Pillutla United Kingdom
Geoffrey B. Sprinkle United States
Nancy R. Buchan United States
Peter J. Carnevale United States
Peter H. Kim United States
Xiao-Ping Chen United States
Lisa D. Ordóñez United States
Laura J. Kray United States
Björn Frank Japan
Kelly D. Martin United States
Lamar Pierce relative to Madan M. Pillutla United Kingdom Madan M. Pillutla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Madan M. Pillutla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lamar Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lamar Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lamar Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lamar Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lamar Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lamar Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lamar Pierce. The network helps show where Lamar Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lamar Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lamar Pierce Line = papers co-authored together Lamar Pierce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009258
2 2009233
3 2012205
4 2015196
5 2008195
6 2008148
7 2013148
8 2014140
9 2017138
10 2010136
11 2016135
12 2010112
13 200899
14 201493
15 201779
16 201264
17 201355
18 201755
19 201952
20 201546

About Lamar Pierce

Lamar Pierce is a scholar working on Safety Research, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Information Systems and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 73 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (29 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (16 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (12 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (9 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (6 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (6 papers) and Corruption and Economic Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (795 citations), Information Systems and Management (636 citations), General Decision Sciences (120 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (554 citations) and Strategy and Management (679 citations). Lamar Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Francesca Gino, Ian Larkin, Jason A. Snyder, Timothy Gubler, Tat Y. Chan, Victor Manuel Bennett, Daniel C. Snow, Andrew P. McAfee, Michael W. Toffel and Jia Li. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Organization Science, Strategic Management Journal, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact