L. Prut

8 papers receiving 3.0k citations

L. Prut's Hit Papers

The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review 2003 · 2.5k citations
2.5k0+7+15Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k

Peers

L. Prut
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 669
  • Biological Psychiatry 347
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 189
  • Neurology 278
Replace Raymond Mongeau with:
Raymond Mongeau France
Wayne Rowe Canada
Lynn G. Kirby United States
Cédric Mombereau Switzerland
Martine Hascoët France
András Bilkei‐Gorzó Germany
Georgianna G. Gould United States
Joyce Besheer United States
Leslie L. Devaud United States
Vincenzo Micale Italy
L. Prut relative to Raymond Mongeau France Raymond Mongeau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Raymond Mongeau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Prut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Prut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Prut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Prut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Prut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Prut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Prut. The network helps show where L. Prut may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Prut, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Prut Line = papers co-authored together L. Prut links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review
Hit paper breakdown →
20032459
2 2002436
3 201045
4 200731
5 200329
6 200813
7 20123
8
Réponses induites par les benzodiazépines chez des souris mutantes
20031

About L. Prut

L. Prut is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (1 paper) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (669 citations), Biological Psychiatry (347 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (189 citations) and Neurology (278 citations). L. Prut has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Belzung, Florence Crestani, Kaspar E. Vogt, Jean‐Marc Fritschy, Uwe Rudolph, H. Möhler, Horst Blüthmann, Dietmar Benke, Ruth Keist and George Prenosil. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Genes Brain & Behavior, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, European Journal of Pharmacology and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact