Kyle Nash

3.3k citations
47 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

    • Behavioral Health and Interventions
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Papers in

Kyle Nash

46 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Kyle Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Applied Psychology 168
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 634
  • Health 249
  • Social Psychology 626
  • General Decision Sciences 37
Replace Sarah J. Barber with:
Sarah J. Barber United States
Miguel Farias United Kingdom
Jill A. Jacobson Canada
Jinkyung Na South Korea
W. Richard Walker United States
Sarah L. Master United States
Andrew E. Reed United States
Matthew A. Killingsworth United States
Paul Condon United States
Evan C. Carter United States
Kyle Nash relative to Sarah J. Barber United States Sarah J. Barber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Sarah J. Barber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Nash. The network helps show where Kyle Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Nash Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009210
2 2009171
3 2010155
4 201068
5 201168
6 201066
7 200866
8 201057
9 201254
10 202343
11 202342
12 201340
13 201439
14 201638
15 201538
16 202328
17 201226
18 201325
19 201823
20 202219

About Kyle Nash

Kyle Nash is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (168 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (634 citations), Health (249 citations), Social Psychology (626 citations) and General Decision Sciences (37 citations). Kyle Nash has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ian McGregor, Michael Inzlicht, Mike Prentice, Danielle Gaucher, Aaron C. Kay, Jacob B. Hirsh, Lorena R. R. Gianotti, Daria Knoch, Tobias Kleinert and Curtis E. Phills. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Topography, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Biological Psychology, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience and Cerebral Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact