Kyle Nash

3.3k citations
52 papers · 2.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle Nash

51 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Kyle Nash's Hit Papers

Threat and Defense 2013 · 347 citations
3470+4+8Years since publication100200300

Peers

Kyle Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Applied Psychology 252
  • Social Psychology 971
  • Health 323
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 775
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 312
Replace Heather M. Claypool with:
Heather M. Claypool United States
Neil Dagnall United Kingdom
Ian R. Newby‐Clark Canada
Megan L. Knowles United States
Tammy English United States
Eddie M. W. Tong Singapore
Jinkyung Na South Korea
Miguel Farias United Kingdom
Gary J. Lewis United Kingdom
Sarah J. Barber United States
Kyle Nash relative to Heather M. Claypool United States Heather M. Claypool's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Heather M. Claypool · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Nash. The network helps show where Kyle Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Nash Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Threat and Defense
Hit paper breakdown →
2013347
2 2009260
3 2009209
4 2010169
5 2010104
6 200880
7 201075
8 201173
9 201059
10 201259
11 202343
12 201443
13 202342
14 201641
15 201340
16 201539
17 202328
18 201228
19 201326
20 201823

About Kyle Nash

Kyle Nash is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (18 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (252 citations), Social Psychology (971 citations), Health (323 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (775 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (312 citations). Kyle Nash has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ian McGregor, Michael Inzlicht, Danielle Gaucher, Aaron C. Kay, Mike Prentice, Jacob B. Hirsh, Daria Knoch, Lorena R. R. Gianotti, Curtis E. Phills and Tobias Kleinert. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Topography, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Biological Psychology, European Journal of Neuroscience and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact