Eva Jonas

156 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Eva Jonas
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Applied Psychology 841
  • General Decision Sciences 336
  • Social Psychology 2.5k
  • Health 439
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.4k
Replace Alain Van Hiel with:
Alain Van Hiel Belgium
Kees van den Bos Netherlands
Gerd Bohner Germany
Joachim I. Krueger United States
Elizabeth W. Dunn Canada
Deborah A. Prentice United States
James A. Shepperd United States
Rodolfo Mendoza‐Denton United States
Gordon B. Moskowitz United States
Larissa Z. Tiedens United States
Eva Jonas relative to Alain Van Hiel Belgium Alain Van Hiel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Alain Van Hiel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Jonas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Jonas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Jonas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Jonas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Jonas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Jonas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Jonas. The network helps show where Eva Jonas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Jonas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Jonas Line = papers co-authored together Eva Jonas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 168 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001406
2 2001391
3 2002307
4 2015262
5 2006247
6 2008185
7 2005165
8 2012164
9 2008131
10 2011131
11 2009127
12 2003123
13 2005100
14 200390
15 200683
16 200979
17 200368
18 201366
19 200565
20 201161

About Eva Jonas

Eva Jonas is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 168 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (64 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (40 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (29 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (26 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (23 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (16 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (14 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (841 citations), General Decision Sciences (336 citations), Social Psychology (2.5k citations), Health (439 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (2.4k citations). Eva Jonas has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dieter Frey, Stefan Schulz‐Hardt, Immo Fritsche, Jeff Greenberg, Peter Fischer, Eva Traut‐Mattausch, Johannes Klackl, Tom Pyszczynski, Christina Steindl and Sandra Sittenthaler. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, European Journal of Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact