Daniel Randles
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
-
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 3
- Mind wandering and attention 2
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 3
- Mental Health Research Topics 2
- Co-authors
- Michael Inzlicht (4 shared papers)Steven J. Heine (5 shared papers)Paul L. Hewitt (1 shared paper)Kyle Nash (1 shared paper)Gordon L. Flett (1 shared paper)Ian McGregor (1 shared paper)Blair Saunders (1 shared paper)Alexander Etz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1 paper)Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (1 paper)Frontiers in Neuroscience (1 paper)Personality and Individual Differences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel Randles
9 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Applied Psychology 77
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 136
- General Decision Sciences 18
- Clinical Psychology 111
- Social Psychology 102
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Randles
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Randles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Randles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Randles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Randles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Randles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Randles. The network helps show where Daniel Randles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Randles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 104 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 6 |
About Daniel Randles
Daniel Randles is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Mind wandering and attention (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (77 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (136 citations), General Decision Sciences (18 citations), Clinical Psychology (111 citations) and Social Psychology (102 citations). Daniel Randles has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Inzlicht, Steven J. Heine, Paul L. Hewitt, Kyle Nash, Gordon L. Flett, Ian McGregor, Blair Saunders, Alexander Etz, Marina Milyavskaya and Alexa M. Tullett. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Frontiers in Neuroscience and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.