King

8 papers receiving 703 citations

King's Hit Papers

Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations1 2005 · 645 citations
6450+7+14Years since publication200400600

Peers

King
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Communication 279
  • Information Systems and Management 200
  • Management Information Systems 195
  • Strategy and Management 236
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 68
Replace J. Roberto Evaristo with:
J. Roberto Evaristo United States
Mary R. Lind United States
Karma Sherif United States
Mihir A. Parikh United States
Michael S.H. Heng Australia
Robey United States
D.H. Drury Canada
Martin D. Goslar United States
Fenio Annansingh United Kingdom
Alina Dulipovici United States
King relative to J. Roberto Evaristo United States J. Roberto Evaristo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
J. Roberto Evaristo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by King. The network helps show where King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with King Line = papers co-authored together King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations1
Hit paper breakdown →
2005645
2 201235
3 199815
4 200014
5 199612
6 20075
7 19942
8 19932
9 20200

About King

King is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacology, Neurology, Management Information Systems and Family Practice, having authored 9 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper), Medication Adherence and Compliance (1 paper), Neural Networks and Applications (1 paper), Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (1 paper) and Image and Object Detection Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (279 citations), Information Systems and Management (200 citations), Management Information Systems (195 citations), Strategy and Management (236 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (68 citations). King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Laurie J. Kirsch, Karen Grimmer, Janine Dizon, Consuelo Gonzalez-Suarez, Yang� Yang and James James. Their work appears in journals such as MIS Quarterly, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, Journal of Healthcare Leadership, Clinical & Experimental Allergy and Real Analysis Exchange.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact