Khanh Phan

19 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Khanh Phan
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Water Science and Technology 194
  • Biotechnology 67
  • Biomaterials 77
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 105
  • Pharmaceutical Science 30
Replace Marı́lia Mateus with:
Marı́lia Mateus Portugal
P. Torre Italy
Glòria González Spain
Serap Gedikli Türkiye
Sangita Bhattacharjee India
Machiko Takigami Japan
Özge Dinç Türkiye
Hangbo Xu China
Pooja Bhatnagar India
Jiří Kučera Czechia
Khanh Phan relative to Marı́lia Mateus Portugal Marı́lia Mateus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marı́lia Mateus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Khanh Phan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Khanh Phan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Khanh Phan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Khanh Phan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Khanh Phan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Khanh Phan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Khanh Phan. The network helps show where Khanh Phan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Khanh Phan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Khanh Phan Line = papers co-authored together Khanh Phan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019124
2 201886
3 201760
4 202046
5 202133
6 202128
7 201927
8 202418
9 201415
10 20249
11 20178
12 20257
13 20237
14 20247
15 20243
16 20242
17 20132
18 20252
19 20251
20 20230

About Khanh Phan

Khanh Phan is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Pharmaceutical Science, Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering and Dermatology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (7 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (5 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (4 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (4 papers), Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition (4 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers) and Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (194 citations), Biotechnology (67 citations), Biomaterials (77 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (105 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (30 citations). Khanh Phan has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Vietnam and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Tuyen Truong, Bhesh Bhandari, Yong Wang, Huan Tai Phan, Yuthana Phimolsiripol, Charles S. Brennan, Dheerawan Boonyawan, Joe M. Regenstein, Yousuf Mohammed and Kittisak Jantanasakulwong. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Science & Technology, Pharmaceutics, Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Food Biophysics and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact