Water Science and Technology

801.8k papers and 20.7M indexed citations i.

About

801.8k papers covering Water Science and Technology have received a total of 20.7M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal and Membrane Separation Technologies and also cover the fields of Biomedical Engineering, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Engineering. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Global and Planetary Change. Some of the most active scholars covering Water Science and Technology are Menachem Elimelech, Gordon McKay, Lenore S. Clesceri, A. E. Greenberg, Andrew D. Eaton, Yuh‐Shan Ho, Louis J. Farrugia, B.H. Hameed, Keith Beven and Vinod Kumar Gupta.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Water Science and Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Water Science and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Water Science and Technology.

Countries where authors publish papers about Water Science and Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Water Science and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Water Science and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Water Science and Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025