Kenneth Boyd

35 papers receiving 826 citations

Peers

Kenneth Boyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Ophthalmology 75
  • General Health Professions 151
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 168
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 56
  • Philosophy 48
Replace Lawrence E. Klein with:
Lawrence E. Klein United States
Erhan Eser Türkiye
Satoshi Toyokawa Japan
Ruth Miyuki Santo Brazil
Karen M. Sanders United States
Fiona Kennedy United Kingdom
Péter Kakuk Hungary
Jürgen Kasper Germany
Deborah Dillon McDonald United States
Jill Carlton United Kingdom
Kenneth Boyd relative to Lawrence E. Klein United States Lawrence E. Klein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.3×
Lawrence E. Klein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Boyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Boyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Boyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Boyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Boyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Boyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Boyd. The network helps show where Kenneth Boyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Boyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth Boyd Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth Boyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004537
2 2000120
3 201832
4 201530
5 201427
6 200726
7 202122
8 200520
9 200219
10 199013
11
The Ethics of resource allocation in health care
19797
12 20217
13 19947
14 20226
15 20035
16 20075
17
Levi's Challenge and Peirce's Theory/Practice Distinction
20125
18 19874
19 20013
20 19993

About Kenneth Boyd

Kenneth Boyd is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine and Ophthalmology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (6 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (75 citations), General Health Professions (151 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (168 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (56 citations) and Philosophy (48 citations). Kenneth Boyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert V. Carlson, David John Webb, Alan Davies, Julian Savulescu, Peter S Hall, Roger Higgs, Carol Currie, Luisa M Pettigrew, Mark A. Taggart and Nadja van Ginneken. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Medical Education and Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact