British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

409.6k citations
13.8k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Pharmacology top 0.2%
    • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
    • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
    • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
    • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Papers in

    • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 1.2k
    • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy 540
    • Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment 487
    • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 462

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

11.2k papers receiving 316.3k citations

Peers

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Pharmacology 56.4k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 16.7k
  • Toxicology 12.6k
  • Pharmacology 49.7k
  • Family Practice 4.9k
Replace European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology with:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Germany
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics United States
The American Journal of Medicine United States
Journal of Clinical Oncology United States
Annals of Pharmacotherapy United States
Frontiers in Pharmacology China
Circulation United States
Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy United States
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology United States
Clinical Pharmacokinetics United States
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology relative to European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Germany European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

About British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

The 13.8k papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 409.6k indexed citations . Papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology usually cover Pharmacology (1.6k papers), Geriatrics and Gerontology (471 papers), Pharmacology (1.9k papers), Toxicology (364 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1.2k papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (932 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (646 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (540 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (516 papers), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (487 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (462 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (462 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are Jeffrey Aronson, John O. Miners, Philip C. Calder, Emilio Perucca, Munir Pirmohamed, Arduino Aleksander Mangoni, I. Hindmarch, Pertti J. Neuvonen, Stephen H. Jackson and LF Prescott.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact