British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

385.5k citations
12.7k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Pharmacology top 0.2%
    • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
    • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
    • Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
    • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Papers in

    • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 1.0k
    • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy 495
    • Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment 440
    • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 384

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

10.2k papers receiving 299.0k citations

Peers

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Pharmacology 53.8k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 15.5k
  • Toxicology 11.3k
  • Pharmacology 46.7k
  • Family Practice 4.5k
Replace European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology with:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Germany
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics United States
The American Journal of Medicine United States
Journal of Clinical Oncology United States
Frontiers in Pharmacology China
Annals of Pharmacotherapy United States
Circulation United States
Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy United States
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology United States
Clinical Pharmacokinetics United States
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology relative to European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Germany European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

About British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

The 12.7k papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 385.5k indexed citations . Papers published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology usually cover Pharmacology (1.4k papers), Geriatrics and Gerontology (391 papers), Pharmacology (1.7k papers), Toxicology (297 papers) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (394 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1.0k papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (778 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (565 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (495 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (481 papers), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (440 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (427 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (384 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are John O. Miners, Philip C. Calder, Emilio Perucca, Jeffrey K Aronson, Arduino A. Mangoni, I. Hindmarch, Munir Pirmohamed, Pertti J. Neuvonen, LF Prescott and Stephen H. Jackson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact