Katherine Picho

23 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

Katherine Picho
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Family Practice 104
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
  • Gender Studies 56
  • Safety Research 38
  • Social Psychology 73
Replace Hsun‐Yu Chan with:
Hsun‐Yu Chan Taiwan
Doris L. Redfield United States
Kinnard White United States
Timothy A. Steenbergh United States
Jane Fowler Australia
Svetlana A. Beltyukova United States
Mahbub Sarkar Australia
Stephanie L. Anderson United States
Keaton A. Fletcher United States
Margaret M. Plack United States
Katherine Picho relative to Hsun‐Yu Chan Taiwan Hsun‐Yu Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Hsun‐Yu Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Picho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Picho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Picho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Picho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Picho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Picho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Picho. The network helps show where Katherine Picho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Katherine Picho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katherine Picho Line = papers co-authored together Katherine Picho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201272
2 201364
3 201351
4 201548
5 201647
6 201741
7 201137
8 201530
9 201130
10 201720
11 201615
12 201714
13 201710
14 201510
15 20218
16 20167
17 20176
18 20234
19 20213
20 20153

About Katherine Picho

Katherine Picho is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Family Practice, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (4 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (104 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 citations), Gender Studies (56 citations), Safety Research (38 citations) and Social Psychology (73 citations). Katherine Picho has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ariel N. Rodriguez, Anthony R. Artino, Scott W. Brown, Steven J. Durning, Jason M. Stephens, Lambert Schuwirth, Elexis McBee, Temple Ratcliffe, Katie S. Martin and Emil Coman. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, The Journal of Educational Research, Journal of Advanced Academics, Perspectives on Medical Education and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact