Kate McLaughlin

1.4k citations
14 papers · 832 · 1 hit paper · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kate McLaughlin

14 papers receiving 714 citations

Kate McLaughlin's Hit Papers

New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects 2005 · 491 citations
4910+7+14Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Kate McLaughlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Public Administration 336
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 120
  • Strategy and Management 151
  • Political Science and International Relations 229
  • Finance 98
Replace James Downe with:
James Downe United Kingdom
Christopher Hood United Kingdom
Jenny Harrow United Kingdom
Robert Pyper United Kingdom
Denis Saint‐Martin Canada
Rachel Ashworth United Kingdom
Stephanie Moulton United States
Marlies Honingh Netherlands
Anna Pollert United Kingdom
Asbjørn Roiseland Norway
Kate McLaughlin relative to James Downe United Kingdom James Downe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James Downe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate McLaughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate McLaughlin. The network helps show where Kate McLaughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Kate McLaughlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate McLaughlin Line = papers co-authored together Kate McLaughlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects
Hit paper breakdown →
2005491
2 200475
3 200864
4 200549
5 200239
6 200935
7 200430
8 200313
9 200210
10 20059
11 20106
12 20025
13 20035
14 20091

About Kate McLaughlin

Kate McLaughlin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Finance, Public Administration, Education and Strategy and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (7 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (5 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (1 paper), Social Work Education and Practice (1 paper) and Corporate Identity and Reputation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (336 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (120 citations), Strategy and Management (151 citations), Political Science and International Relations (229 citations) and Finance (98 citations). Kate McLaughlin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Osborne, Ewan Ferlı́e and Celine Chew. Their work appears in journals such as Public Management Review, Public Money & Management, European Business Organization Law Review, Regional Studies and Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact