Celine Chew

413 citations
16 papers · 275 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Celine Chew

16 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Celine Chew
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Public Administration 68
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 86
  • Finance 65
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 44
  • Strategy and Management 87
Replace Betty Jane Richmond with:
Betty Jane Richmond Canada
Agnes Meinhard Canada
ChiaKo Hung United States
Tracey M. Coule United Kingdom
Rolf Rønning Norway
Russ Glennon United Kingdom
Joost Fledderus Netherlands
Denis Harrisson Canada
Stephen Greasley United Kingdom
Wendy Scaife Australia
Celine Chew relative to Betty Jane Richmond Canada Betty Jane Richmond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Betty Jane Richmond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celine Chew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celine Chew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celine Chew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celine Chew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celine Chew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celine Chew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celine Chew. The network helps show where Celine Chew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Celine Chew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celine Chew Line = papers co-authored together Celine Chew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200864
2 200935
3 200732
4 200729
5 200625
6 201221
7 201115
8 200813
9 201012
10 20098
11 20128
12
Innovation and social enterprise activity in third sector organisations
20125
13
Use it or lose it
20073
14 20213
15 20091
16
What factors influence positioning strategies in voluntary non-profit organisations? Towards a conceptual framework
20031

About Celine Chew

Celine Chew is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Finance and Public Administration, having authored 16 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (10 papers), Organizational Strategy and Culture (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (5 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Service and Product Innovation (2 papers) and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (68 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (86 citations), Finance (65 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (44 citations) and Strategy and Management (87 citations). Celine Chew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Osborne, Kate McLaughlin, Ian Bruce, Tony Hines, Gillian Wright and Fergus Lyon. Their work appears in journals such as Public Management Review, Public Money & Management, British Journal of Management, Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit and Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact