Kate Davis

1.0k citations
43 papers · 733 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Davis

37 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Kate Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Library and Information Sciences 45
  • Clinical Psychology 306
  • Computer Science Applications 79
  • Communication 55
  • Education 181
Replace Ali Asghar Hayat with:
Ali Asghar Hayat Iran
Daphne Greenberg United States
Denise B. Stockley Canada
Helen E. Greenwood United Kingdom
Barbara L. Ludlow United States
Dave L. Edyburn United States
Rachel Ivy Clarke United States
Ryan G. Carlson United States
Ravi C. Paul Zambia
Jordan Eschler United States
Kate Davis relative to Ali Asghar Hayat Iran Ali Asghar Hayat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.7×
Ali Asghar Hayat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Davis. The network helps show where Kate Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Davis Line = papers co-authored together Kate Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009233
2 2015103
3 201473
4 201749
5 201425
6 201421
7 201419
8 201217
9 201217
10 201116
11 201513
12
Everyday life information experiences in Twitter: a grounded theory
201913
13 201412
14 201410
15 200710
16 201410
17 20169
18 20129
19 20129
20 20217

About Kate Davis

Kate Davis is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Education, Information Systems, Computer Science Applications and Information Systems and Management, having authored 43 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Web and Library Services (7 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (5 papers), Library Science and Administration (4 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (45 citations), Clinical Psychology (306 citations), Computer Science Applications (79 citations), Communication (55 citations) and Education (181 citations). Kate Davis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Susana T. Gavidia-Payne, Andrew James Peter Francis, Mandy Lupton, Kirsty Kitto, Helen Partridge, Zaana Howard, Christine Susan Bruce, Hilary E. Hughes, Jill Willis and Ian D. Stoodley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, Serials Review, Reference Services Review, Studies in Science Education and Topics in Early Childhood Special Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact