Kate Chatfield

19 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Kate Chatfield
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Business and International Management 33
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 49
  • Marketing 58
  • Strategy and Management 92
  • Health Informatics 6
Replace Liang Shang with:
Liang Shang Hong Kong
Ghulam Hussain Pakistan
Loïck Menvielle France
Erik Lindhult Sweden
Carla Riverola Australia
Clemente Forero Pineda Colombia
Maarten C. A. van der Sanden Netherlands
Hugo Confraria Netherlands
Mark Gagnon United States
Kate Chatfield relative to Liang Shang Hong Kong Liang Shang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Liang Shang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Chatfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Chatfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Chatfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Chatfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Chatfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Chatfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Chatfield. The network helps show where Kate Chatfield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Chatfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Chatfield Line = papers co-authored together Kate Chatfield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2017115
2 201941
3 201739
4 201933
5 201725
6 201821
7 201916
8 202015
9 20079
10 20207
11 20185
12
Responsible-Industry: A Framework for implementing responsible research and innovation in ICT for an ageing society
20165
13 20205
14 20244
15 20223
16 20242
17 20182
18 20232
19 20211

About Kate Chatfield

Kate Chatfield is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Complementary and alternative medicine and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 19 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (1 paper), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (33 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (49 citations), Marketing (58 citations), Strategy and Management (92 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Kate Chatfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Carsten Stahl, Alexander Brem, Veikko Ikonen, Emad Yaghmaei, Doris Schroeder, Peter Herissone-Kelly, Nearchos Paspallis, Carolyn Ten Holter, Konstantinos Iatridis and Roger Chennells. Their work appears in journals such as Research Ethics, Sustainability, Homeopathy, Journal of Cleaner Production and Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact