Doris Schroeder

57 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Doris Schroeder
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Health Informatics 21
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 284
  • Business and International Management 22
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 57
  • General Health Professions 175
Replace Fiona J. Newton with:
Fiona J. Newton Australia
Sheena Carlisle United Kingdom
Johann Mouton South Africa
Ana Viseu Canada
Rob Hagendijk Netherlands
Jacqueline Leta Brazil
Nelius Boshoff South Africa
Philippa Hunter‐Jones United Kingdom
Jill Zarestky United States
Holly Donohoe United States
Doris Schroeder relative to Fiona J. Newton Australia Fiona J. Newton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Fiona J. Newton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doris Schroeder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Schroeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Schroeder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Schroeder. The network helps show where Doris Schroeder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Doris Schroeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doris Schroeder Line = papers co-authored together Doris Schroeder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200999
2 200760
3 200956
4 201750
5 200845
6 200241
7 201238
8 201538
9 200437
10 201933
11 201930
12 201528
13 200426
14 200925
15 202225
16 200922
17 200322
18 200621
19
Ethics, Justice and the Convention on Biological Diversity
201020
20 201916

About Doris Schroeder

Doris Schroeder is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 58 papers that have together received 915 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (12 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers) and International Maritime Law Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (21 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (284 citations), Business and International Management (22 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (57 citations) and General Health Professions (175 citations). Doris Schroeder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Cyprus and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Eugenijus Gefenas, Roger Chennells, Konstantinos Iatridis, Garrath Williams, Rachel Wynberg, Kate Chatfield, Thomas Pogge, Clare Palmer, Peter Herissone-Kelly and François Hirsch. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Research Ethics, Res Publica, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics and Journal of Korean Medical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact