Research Ethics

478 papers and 3.2k indexed citations

About

The 478 papers published in Research Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Research Ethics usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (271 papers), General Health Professions (218 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (119 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (248 papers), Ethics in medical practice (155 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research Ethics are Ranjan Datta, Jan Dewing, Catherine Flick, Karen Rodham, Jeff Gavin, Nathan Emmerich, David B. Resnik, Claudia Pagliari, Joanna Taylor and Stine Lomborg.

In The Last Decade

Research Ethics

383 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Research Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in Research Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026