Junping Cheng

49 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers

Junping Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Biological Psychiatry 27
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 64
  • Reproductive Medicine 49
  • Neurology 43
  • Immunology 72
Replace Donavon Charles Hiss with:
Donavon Charles Hiss South Africa
Maroua Jalouli Saudi Arabia
Yeong‐Seon Won South Korea
Maizaton Atmadini Abdullah Malaysia
Tianyong Hu China
Hye Jin An South Korea
Wutigri Nimlamool Thailand
Takakazu Mitani Japan
Haiyan Han China
Hye Hyeon Lee South Korea
Junping Cheng relative to Donavon Charles Hiss South Africa Donavon Charles Hiss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Donavon Charles Hiss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Junping Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Junping Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Junping Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Junping Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Junping Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Junping Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Junping Cheng. The network helps show where Junping Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Junping Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Junping Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Junping Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201477
2 200668
3 201462
4 201638
5 201633
6 200527
7 200626
8 201622
9 201619
10 200719
11 201619
12 201616
13 200715
14 200315
15 201411
16 201211
17 202111
18 201310
19 20149
20 20069

About Junping Cheng

Junping Cheng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Immunology, Reproductive Medicine and Plant Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (27 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (64 citations), Reproductive Medicine (49 citations), Neurology (43 citations) and Immunology (72 citations). Junping Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, Czechia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Wenxia Zhou, Yongxiang Zhang, Xiaorui Zhang, Chunhui Qi, Xiaorui Cheng, Zhiyong Xiao, Yingjie Li, Gang Liu, Ri‐Fang Yang and Shuyi Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Chinese Chemical Letters, Oncotarget, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Bioconjugate Chemistry and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact