Julia Keith
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Ekaterina Rogaeva (21 shared papers)Lorne Zinman (18 shared papers)Janice Robertson (13 shared papers)Sandra E. Black (18 shared papers)Shangxi Xiao (7 shared papers)Arjun Sahgal (14 shared papers)Samar Dib (2 shared papers)Christine Sato (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurology (6 papers)Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques (6 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (6 papers)Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (3 papers)Acta Neuropathologica (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Julia Keith
80 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Neurology 950
- Genetics 579
- Neurology 178
- Molecular Biology 703
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 177
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Keith
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Keith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Keith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Keith. The network helps show where Julia Keith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 213 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 139 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 115 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 108 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 107 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 77 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 10 | Hyperthermia as a teratogenic agent. | 1974 | 53 |
| 11 | 2017 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 37 |
About Julia Keith
Julia Keith is a scholar working on Neurology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (19 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (14 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (8 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (8 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (5 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (5 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (950 citations), Genetics (579 citations), Neurology (178 citations), Molecular Biology (703 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (177 citations). Julia Keith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ekaterina Rogaeva, Lorne Zinman, Janice Robertson, Sandra E. Black, Shangxi Xiao, Arjun Sahgal, Samar Dib, Christine Sato, Danielle Moreno and Paul M. McKeever. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology and Acta Neuropathologica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.