John Conklin

3.1k citations
104 papers · 2.2k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

John Conklin

98 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

John Conklin
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Health Informatics 29
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 442
  • Neurology 264
  • Rheumatology 258
  • Nephrology 99
Replace Lin Li with:
Lin Li China
Georgios Karanikas Austria
Chin‐Sheng Lin Taiwan
Jens‐Peter Kühn Germany
Barbara Palumbo Italy
Frank D. Verbraak Netherlands
T. Sasaki Japan
Ronald P. Danis United States
Dong Hwan Kim South Korea
Sebastian J. Buss Germany
John Conklin relative to Lin Li China Lin Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Lin Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Conklin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Conklin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Conklin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Conklin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Conklin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Conklin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Conklin. The network helps show where John Conklin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Conklin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Conklin Line = papers co-authored together John Conklin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015122
2 2014121
3 201697
4 200588
5 201077
6 201771
7 201071
8 201464
9 201760
10 201459
11 201153
12 201347
13 201945
14
A new method for the determination of nitrofurantoin in urine.
196545
15 201143
16 196543
17 201641
18 201937
19 201936
20 201135

About John Conklin

John Conklin is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Rheumatology and Neurology, having authored 104 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (21 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (12 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (10 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (8 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (29 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (442 citations), Neurology (264 citations), Rheumatology (258 citations) and Nephrology (99 citations). John Conklin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David J. Mikulis, Daniel M. Mandell, Joseph A. Fisher, Chris Eliasmith, Adrian P. Crawley, Julien Poublanc, Michael Tymianski, Jorn Fierstra, Thierry Dervieux and Frank L. Silver. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Neuroradiology, Lupus Science & Medicine, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Clinical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact