Joseph Piper

715 citations
18 papers · 534 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Curcumin's Biomedical Applications
  • Geophysics top 10%
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
    • High-pressure geophysics and materials

Papers in

Joseph Piper

15 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Joseph Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Molecular Medicine 141
  • Geophysics 116
  • Paleontology 36
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 65
  • Pharmacology 34
Replace Subrata Banik with:
Subrata Banik Bangladesh
Sidney Gonçalo de Lima Brazil
N. P. Sen Canada
Ran Liu China
Muhammad Naveed Mushtaq Pakistan
Noël J. de Souza United States
Aiman Abrahim Austria
B. Weber Germany
Yanming Liu China
Sang Hoon Lee South Korea
Joseph Piper relative to Subrata Banik Bangladesh Subrata Banik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Subrata Banik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Piper. The network helps show where Joseph Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Piper Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1998221
2 2017143
3 200655
4 197726
5 201722
6 198116
7 200615
8 199612
9 20147
10 20235
11 20224
12 20183
13 19923
14 20131
15 20141
16 20230
17 20250
18 20240

About Joseph Piper

Joseph Piper is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Geophysics and Atmospheric Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Nutrition and Water Access (6 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (5 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (5 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (141 citations), Geophysics (116 citations), Paleontology (36 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (65 citations) and Pharmacology (34 citations). Joseph Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Peter W. Piper, Melissa Gladstone, Tim Rolph, D. N. Thomas, Oliver Cumming, Elizabeth Allen, Andrew J. Prendergast, Jaya Chandna, Daniel B. Hawcutt and Amir Kirolos. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of The Earth and Planetary Interiors, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact