Jonathan Tuke
Impact in
- Small Animals top 2%
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Transplantation top 10%
Papers in
-
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 7
- Genetics 12
- Forensic and Genetic Research 6
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Mark Rowland Hutchinson (7 shared papers)Paul Edward Rolan (6 shared papers)Nigel Geoffrey Bean (8 shared papers)Lars Sommer Jermiin (1 shared paper)Stephen Crotty (1 shared paper)Bùi Quang Minh (1 shared paper)Arndt von Haeseler (1 shared paper)Barbara R. Holland (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (4 papers)Animals (4 papers)Nature (3 papers)Brain Behavior and Immunity (3 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Tuke
70 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Small Animals 147
- Transplantation 39
- Anthropology 124
- Biological Psychiatry 10
- Paleontology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Tuke
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Tuke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Tuke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Tuke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Tuke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Tuke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Tuke. The network helps show where Jonathan Tuke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Tuke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 149 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 45 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 44 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 37 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 21 |
About Jonathan Tuke
Jonathan Tuke is a scholar working on Small Animals, Genetics, Transplantation, Pharmacology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (7 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (6 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (147 citations), Transplantation (39 citations), Anthropology (124 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations) and Paleontology (70 citations). Jonathan Tuke has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark Rowland Hutchinson, Paul Edward Rolan, Nigel Geoffrey Bean, Lars Sommer Jermiin, Stephen Crotty, Bùi Quang Minh, Arndt von Haeseler, Barbara R. Holland, Desmond B Williams and Gabrielle Christine Musk. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Animals, Nature, Brain Behavior and Immunity and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.