Jonathan Smith

58 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jonathan Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Education 699
  • General Decision Sciences 27
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 77
  • Safety Research 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
Replace Joshua Goodman with:
Joshua Goodman United States
C. Kirabo Jackson United States
José Alberto Molina Chueca Spain
Niamh Moore‐Cherry Ireland
Jacqueline C. Vischer Canada
Clifford Nowell United States
Julia Lee United States
Jacqueline Zweig United States
J. Ignacio Giménez-Nadal Spain
Sylke V. Schnepf United Kingdom
Jonathan Smith relative to Joshua Goodman United States Joshua Goodman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Joshua Goodman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Smith. The network helps show where Jonathan Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012176
2 2020148
3 201397
4 201674
5 201653
6 200252
7 201447
8 201746
9 202042
10 201638
11 201534
12 201532
13 202132
14 201730
15 201429
16 201325
17 200522
18 201721
19 201616
20 201314

About Jonathan Smith

Jonathan Smith is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Strategy and Management, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Research Studies (41 papers), School Choice and Performance (21 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (6 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers) and Environmental Impact and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (699 citations), General Decision Sciences (27 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (77 citations), Safety Research (65 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations). Jonathan Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Hurwitz, Jessica Howell, Joshua Goodman, Michael Luca, Matea Pender, Robert Jisung Park, Oded Gurantz, Christopher Norio Avery, Lisa J. Dettling and Sarena F. Goodman. Their work appears in journals such as Economics of Education Review, The Journal of Human Resources, Education Finance and Policy, American Economic Journal Economic Policy and Journal of Labor Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact