Jonathan Repple

6.4k citations
47 papers · 712 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Repple

45 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers

Jonathan Repple
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Biological Psychiatry 65
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 234
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 111
Replace Susanne Meinert with:
Susanne Meinert Germany
Xiuli Wang China
Tatsui Otsuka Japan
Jaryd Hiser United States
Rebecca Kerestes Australia
Haris Aslam United States
Laura K. M. Han Netherlands
Manfred Klöbl Austria
Huixia Zhou China
Pozi Liu China
Jonathan Repple relative to Susanne Meinert Germany Susanne Meinert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Susanne Meinert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Repple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Repple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Repple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Repple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Repple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Repple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Repple. The network helps show where Jonathan Repple may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Repple, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Repple Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Repple links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201760
2 201852
3 201749
4 201949
5 201845
6 201944
7 201840
8 202039
9 201737
10 201927
11 201424
12 202023
13 202122
14 201721
15 201821
16 201617
17 201915
18 202414
19 202211
20 20229

About Jonathan Repple

Jonathan Repple is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Clinical Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (11 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (65 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (59 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (234 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (124 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (111 citations). Jonathan Repple has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Udo Dannlowski, Nils Opel, Ronny Redlich, Susanne Meinert, Dominik Grotegerd, Verena Enneking, Christina M. Pawliczek, Katharina Förster, Katharina Dohm and Frank Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, Neuropsychopharmacology and The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact