Jonathan Michael Pell

22 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Jonathan Michael Pell
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Health Information Management 111
  • Family Practice 13
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Emergency Medical Services 31
Replace Kendall M. Rogers with:
Kendall M. Rogers United States
Bashar Alyousef United States
Pranita Mishra United States
Anne Belsito United States
Ilona Roušalová United Kingdom
Marguerite Swietlik United States
Sarah T. Corley United States
Bat‐Zion Hose United States
Steffanie J. Bristol United States
Zoe Co United States
Jonathan Michael Pell relative to Kendall M. Rogers United States Kendall M. Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kendall M. Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Michael Pell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Michael Pell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Michael Pell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Michael Pell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Michael Pell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Michael Pell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Michael Pell. The network helps show where Jonathan Michael Pell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Michael Pell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Michael Pell Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Michael Pell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201982
2 201535
3 201635
4 201131
5 202025
6 201224
7 201419
8 201815
9 201314
10 202014
11 202411
12 202111
13 20219
14 20215
15 20185
16 20204
17 20214
18 20224
19 20213
20 20232

About Jonathan Michael Pell

Jonathan Michael Pell is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (9 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers) and Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (111 citations), Family Practice (13 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (31 citations). Jonathan Michael Pell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Chen‐Tan Lin, Patrick P. Kneeland, Christine Gonzalez, Read G. Pierce, Liron Caplan, Heidi L. Wald, Ethan Cumbler, Darlene B. Tad-y, Michael A. Jones and Stefan Sillau. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Applied Clinical Informatics, JAMA Internal Medicine, Journal of Hospital Medicine and Journal of Surgical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact