Applied Clinical Informatics

1.2k papers and 14.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Applied Clinical Informatics in the last decades have received a total of 14.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Clinical Informatics usually cover Health Information Management (633 papers), General Health Professions (388 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (278 papers) specifically the topics of Electronic Health Records Systems (611 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (218 papers) and Mobile Health Interventions and Applications (151 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Clinical Informatics are Hamed Nadri, Hadi Lotfnezhad Afshar, Bahlol Rahimi, Hardeep Singh, Toomas Timpka, Dean F. Sittig, Christoph U. Lehmann, David W. Bates, Giuseppe Pozzi and Gabriele Pozzani.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Clinical Informatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Clinical Informatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Clinical Informatics.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Clinical Informatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Clinical Informatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Clinical Informatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Clinical Informatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025