Jonathan L. Helm

2.1k citations
57 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan L. Helm

52 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jonathan L. Helm
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 320
  • Clinical Psychology 484
  • Social Psychology 447
  • Applied Psychology 85
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 62
Replace Siwei Liu with:
Siwei Liu United States
Melanie A. Dirks Canada
Julia Leonard United States
Teresa A. Treat United States
Jonathan Lévy Israel
Jingguang Li China
Sonya V. Troller‐Renfree United States
Letícia Oliveira Brazil
Doreen Arcus United States
Nicole R. Giuliani United States
Jonathan L. Helm relative to Siwei Liu United States Siwei Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Siwei Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan L. Helm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan L. Helm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan L. Helm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan L. Helm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan L. Helm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan L. Helm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan L. Helm. The network helps show where Jonathan L. Helm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan L. Helm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan L. Helm Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan L. Helm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012173
2 2011122
3 2014103
4 201295
5 201593
6 201875
7 201764
8 201762
9 202151
10 201649
11 201446
12 202138
13 201136
14 201235
15 201426
16 201925
17 201925
18 201923
19 201822
20 201722

About Jonathan L. Helm

Jonathan L. Helm is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (6 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (320 citations), Clinical Psychology (484 citations), Social Psychology (447 citations), Applied Psychology (85 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (62 citations). Jonathan L. Helm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Emilio Ferrer, David A. Sbarra, Paul D. Hastings, Laura Castro‐Schilo, Michael Pluess, Jay Belsky, Keith F. Widaman, Michael C. Stallings, Luis A. Parra and Jonas G. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Social Development, AIDS and Behavior and Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact