Countries where authors publish in AIDS and Behavior
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AIDS and Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AIDS and Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AIDS and Behavior more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in AIDS and Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AIDS and Behavior.
About AIDS and Behavior
The 5.7k papers published in AIDS and Behavior in the last decades have received a total of 156.0k indexed citations . Papers published in AIDS and Behavior usually cover Infectious Diseases (4.7k papers), Virology (557 papers), General Health Professions (2.8k papers), Epidemiology (3.0k papers) and Emergency Medicine (330 papers) specifically the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4.7k papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2.9k papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2.3k papers), Sex work and related issues (1.4k papers), HIV Research and Treatment (552 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (521 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (377 papers) and HIV-related health complications and treatments (325 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AIDS and Behavior are Valerie A. Earnshaw, Jeffrey T. Parsons, Stephenie R. Chaudoir, Willi McFarland, Kenneth H. Mayer, David R. Bangsberg, Ron Stall, H. Fisher Raymond, Carl A. Latkin and Brian Mustanski.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.