Dale M. Stack

104 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Dale M. Stack
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 204
  • Pharmacy 253
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 418
  • Social Psychology 526
Replace Ginger A. Moore with:
Ginger A. Moore United States
Susan Goldberg Canada
Catherine A. McMahon Australia
Cynthia A. Stifter United States
Ed Tronick United States
Susan B. Goodman Campbell United States
Annie Bernier Canada
Jeffrey R. Measelle United States
J. Marianne Riksen‐Walraven Netherlands
Jennifer C. Ablow United States
Dale M. Stack relative to Ginger A. Moore United States Ginger A. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ginger A. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dale M. Stack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dale M. Stack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dale M. Stack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dale M. Stack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dale M. Stack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dale M. Stack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dale M. Stack. The network helps show where Dale M. Stack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dale M. Stack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dale M. Stack Line = papers co-authored together Dale M. Stack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992185
2 2010159
3 1998149
4 2015139
5 1990128
6 2021128
7 200795
8 201076
9 201169
10 200966
11 201464
12 201163
13 200862
14 201360
15 201257
16 201255
17 199853
18 200752
19 201151
20 201851

About Dale M. Stack

Dale M. Stack is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 108 papers that have together received 3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (56 papers), Infant Health and Development (13 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (13 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (11 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (11 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (10 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (10 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (204 citations), Pharmacy (253 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (418 citations) and Social Psychology (526 citations). Dale M. Stack has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lisa A. Serbin, Alex E. Schwartzman, Darwin W. Muir, Paula L. Ruttle, Jane E. Ledingham, Danielle Kingdon, Elizabeth Anne Shirtcliff, Paul David Hastings, Kalee De France and Tom Hollenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Infant Behavior and Development, Development and Psychopathology, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Developmental Psychobiology and International Journal of Behavioral Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact