Jonathan Field
Impact in
-
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Papers in
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 4
-
- Health, psychology, and well-being 2
- Health Sciences Research and Education 1
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
- Co-authors
- Peter D. White (1 shared paper)Helen Smith (1 shared paper)A. McColl (1 shared paper)Jason W. Brown (1 shared paper)Claire Johnson (1 shared paper)Bart N. Green (1 shared paper)Felicity L. Bishop (1 shared paper)Deborah Kopansky-Giles (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Chiropractic & Manual Therapies (2 papers)Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (1 paper)Clinical Chiropractic (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Field
6 papers receiving 597 citations
Jonathan Field's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 87
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 181
- General Health Professions 564
- Medical Terminology 3
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 298
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Field
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Field. The network helps show where Jonathan Field may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 632 |
| 2 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 5 | Alternative treatment for allergy and asthma. | 2003 | 4 |
| 6 | 2024 | 2 |
About Jonathan Field
Jonathan Field is a scholar working on Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (87 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (181 citations), General Health Professions (564 citations), Medical Terminology (3 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (298 citations). Jonathan Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter D. White, Helen Smith, A. McColl, Jason W. Brown, Claire Johnson, Bart N. Green, Felicity L. Bishop, Deborah Kopansky-Giles, Gabriel C. Quintero Garzola and P. Ehrlich. Their work appears in journals such as Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Clinical Chiropractic, PubMed and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.