A. McColl
Impact in
-
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Policy Implementation Science
Papers in
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 7
- Health Sciences Research and Education 2
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 3
- Co-authors
- Helen Smith (3 shared papers)Peter D. White (1 shared paper)Jonathan Field (1 shared paper)John Gabbay (4 shared papers)Paul Roderick (2 shared papers)Michael Moore (2 shared papers)Cyrus Cooper (1 shared paper)Mark Exworthy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Public Health (2 papers)Age and Ageing (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)BMJ Quality & Safety (2 papers)BMJ (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
A. McColl
9 papers receiving 814 citations
A. McColl's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 90
- General Health Professions 732
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 184
- Health Information Management 114
- Medical Terminology 4
Countries citing papers authored by A. McColl
This map shows the geographic impact of A. McColl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. McColl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. McColl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. McColl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. McColl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. McColl. The network helps show where A. McColl may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside A. McColl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 632 |
| 2 | 1998 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 68 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 |
About A. McColl
A. McColl is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics and Surgery, having authored 9 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Bone health and osteoporosis research (1 paper) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (90 citations), General Health Professions (732 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (184 citations), Health Information Management (114 citations) and Medical Terminology (4 citations). A. McColl has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen Smith, Peter D. White, Jonathan Field, John Gabbay, Paul Roderick, Michael Moore, Paul Roderick, Cyrus Cooper, Mark Exworthy and Paul Roderick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health, Age and Ageing, Social Science & Medicine, BMJ Quality & Safety and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.