Jonathan Dollimore

2.8k citations
47 papers · 1.3k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Dollimore

29 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers

Jonathan Dollimore
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Literature and Literary Theory 520
  • History 255
  • Music 75
  • Gender Studies 207
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 105
Replace Alan Sinfield with:
Alan Sinfield United Kingdom
Sharon Marcus United States
Catherine Belsey United Kingdom
Shoshana Felman United States
Elisabeth Bronfen Switzerland
Naomi Schor United States
Nancy Armstrong United States
Nancy K. Miller United States
Susan Gubar United States
James Olney
Jonathan Dollimore relative to Alan Sinfield United Kingdom Alan Sinfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Alan Sinfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Dollimore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Dollimore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Dollimore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Dollimore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Dollimore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Dollimore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Dollimore. The network helps show where Jonathan Dollimore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Dollimore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Dollimore Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Dollimore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991296
2 1992277
3 1986253
4 1985169
5 1985100
6 197426
7 200323
8 199620
9 198720
10 201315
11 198614
12 199011
13 198611
14 199011
15 19759
16 19888
17 20058
18 19977
19 19866
20 19905

About Jonathan Dollimore

Jonathan Dollimore is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Museology and Philosophy, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (10 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (5 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (2 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (2 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (520 citations), History (255 citations), Music (75 citations), Gender Studies (207 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (105 citations). Jonathan Dollimore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Bruce R. Smith, Alan Sinfield, Jonathan Crewe, Peter Erickson, John F. Andrews, George W. Fenton, P. B. C. Fenwick, Annette E. Maxwell, Catherine Belsey and A. T. Rundle. Their work appears in journals such as Textual Practice, The Modern Language Review, Oxford Literary Review, Shakespeare Quarterly and Critical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact