Textual Practice

1.2k papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Textual Practice in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Textual Practice usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (515 papers), Sociology and Political Science (272 papers) and Philosophy (176 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (140 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (70 papers) and Irish and British Studies (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Textual Practice are V. Mishra, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Roger Luckhurst, Peggy Kamuf, Lawrence Venuti, Alan Sinfield, Simon During, Priyamvada Gopal, John Hartley and Jonathan Dollimore.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Textual Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Textual Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Textual Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Textual Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Textual Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Textual Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Textual Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025