Countries where authors publish in Textual Practice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Textual Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Textual Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Textual Practice more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Textual Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Textual Practice.
About Textual Practice
The 1.4k papers published in Textual Practice in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Textual Practice usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (595 papers), Philosophy (197 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (81 papers), History (118 papers) and Cultural Studies (78 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (160 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (81 papers), Irish and British Studies (71 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (70 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (68 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (48 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (47 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Textual Practice are V. Mishra, Roger Luckhurst, Simon During, Priyamvada Gopal, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Alan Sinfield, Lawrence Venuti, Peggy Kamuf, John Hartley and Annamarie Jagose.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.