Jonathan Crewe

1.8k citations
32 papers · 551 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Crewe

22 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Jonathan Crewe
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Literature and Literary Theory 167
  • History 98
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 40
  • Anthropology 71
  • Social Psychology 136
Replace Susan Rubín Suleiman with:
Susan Rubín Suleiman United States
Nancy K. Miller United States
Jack Santino United States
Naomi Schor United States
Kristina Straub United States
Dan Ben‐Amos United States
Carla Freccero United States
Catherine Belsey United Kingdom
Elisabeth Bronfen Switzerland
Patricia Meyer Spacks United States
Jonathan Crewe relative to Susan Rubín Suleiman United States Susan Rubín Suleiman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Susan Rubín Suleiman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Crewe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Crewe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Crewe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Crewe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Crewe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Crewe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Crewe. The network helps show where Jonathan Crewe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Crewe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Crewe Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Crewe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Acts of Memory: Cultural Recall in the Present
1999363
2 198587
3 198620
4 198311
5 199210
6 19959
7 19978
8 19956
9 19954
10 20013
11 19973
12
Reconfiguring the Renaissance, Essays in Critical Materialism
19923
13 20093
14 20093
15 19902
16 19912
17 19902
18
How far do 'global' ELT coursebooks realize key principles of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and enable effective teaching-learning?
20112
19 19881
20 19861

About Jonathan Crewe

Jonathan Crewe is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, History, Classics and Clinical Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (6 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (3 papers), South African History and Culture (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers) and Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (167 citations), History (98 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (40 citations), Anthropology (71 citations) and Social Psychology (136 citations). Jonathan Crewe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Leo Spitzer, Mieke Bal, Jonathan Dollimore, Gordon Braden, Katharine Eisaman Maus, Joan Rees and Thomas M. Hyde. Their work appears in journals such as MLN, Shakespeare Quarterly, English Literary Renaissance, Representations and Critical Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact