Countries where authors publish in Oxford Literary Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oxford Literary Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oxford Literary Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford Literary Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Oxford Literary Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Oxford Literary Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oxford Literary Review.
About Oxford Literary Review
The 339 papers published in Oxford Literary Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Oxford Literary Review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (217 papers), Philosophy (125 papers), Cultural Studies (36 papers), Gender Studies (17 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 papers) specifically the topics of Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (90 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (84 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (35 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (27 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (25 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (24 papers), French Literature and Criticism (21 papers) and Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oxford Literary Review are Benita Parry, Jacques Derrida, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Homi Κ. Bhabha, Timothy Clark, Bronislaw Szerszynski, David John Lloyd, Michel Foucault, Ania Loomba and Luke Gibbons.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.