Jon Scott

58 papers receiving 844 citations

Peers

Jon Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 170
  • Safety Research 94
  • Biomedical Engineering 221
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 122
  • Education 215
Replace Erik C. Johnson with:
Erik C. Johnson United States
John C. Williams United States
W. Koehler Germany
David C. Tam United States
Kaivon L. Pakzad-Vaezi Canada
William D. Casebeer United States
Alberto Antonietti Italy
Jingjing Chen China
Melinda T. Owens United States
Manuel Schottdorf United States
Jon Scott relative to Erik C. Johnson United States Erik C. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Erik C. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Scott. The network helps show where Jon Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Scott Line = papers co-authored together Jon Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The number and distribution of muscle spindles and tendon organs in the peroneal muscles of the cat.
198794
2 198566
3 201461
4 198541
5 200834
6 198633
7 201431
8 201028
9 199023
10 199123
11 200523
12 200723
13 200822
14 199121
15 199521
16 201621
17 199217
18 199517
19 200517
20
Beta innervation and recurrent inhibition: a hypothesis for manipulatory and postural control.
199616

About Jon Scott

Jon Scott is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Education, Safety Research and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 63 papers that have together received 912 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (22 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (13 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (8 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (7 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (6 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (5 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (170 citations), Safety Research (94 citations), Biomedical Engineering (221 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (122 citations) and Education (215 citations). Jon Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Julien Petit, David J. Barker, Alan J. Cann, Léna Jami, Mark Rawlinson, Robert I. Norman, Adrian Y. C. Wong, H. Kümmel, M. Illert and Paul Green. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Biological Education, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory and Experimental Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact