Michael Stacey

72 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Stacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Neurology 153
  • Rehabilitation 117
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 329
  • Physiology 435
  • Neurology 197
Replace Janusz Błaszczyk with:
Janusz Błaszczyk Poland
Miloš Ljubisavljević United Arab Emirates
James M. Elliott United States
Justin J. Kavanagh Australia
Matthew Ward United States
E.M. Sedgwick United Kingdom
Junichi Sugenoya Japan
Elena Tomilovskaya Russia
M. Bacher Germany
Duncan L. Turner United Kingdom
Michael Stacey relative to Janusz Błaszczyk Poland Janusz Błaszczyk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janusz Błaszczyk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stacey. The network helps show where Michael Stacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stacey Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Free nerve endings in skeletal muscle of the cat.
1969202
2 2006104
3
A study of mammalian intrafusal muscle fibres using a combined histochemical and ultrastructural technique.
197791
4 198290
5 197087
6 201870
7 197669
8 197356
9 201955
10 201440
11 198540
12 200937
13 197836
14 201532
15 197830
16 198630
17 201826
18 198626
19 201226
20 201525

About Michael Stacey

Michael Stacey is a scholar working on Physiology, Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermoregulation and physiological responses (18 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (7 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (6 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (153 citations), Rehabilitation (117 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (329 citations), Physiology (435 citations) and Neurology (197 citations). Michael Stacey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David J. Barker, Robert W. Banks, Carolyn McGregor, David Harker, David R. Woods, Iain Parsons, M. N. Adal, Jon Scott, D. R. Woods and Neil Hill. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Brain Research, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine and Journal of science and medicine in sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact