Jon Entine

649 citations
10 papers · 404 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Entine

9 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Jon Entine
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Strategy and Management 130
  • Marketing 69
  • Gender Studies 67
  • Business and International Management 8
  • Accounting 44
Replace Stephen M. Brown with:
Stephen M. Brown United States
Olivier Gergaud France
Boris Holzer Germany
Matthias Schramm Germany
R. K. Mittal India
John White United Kingdom
Shahid Rasool Pakistan
Jason A. Winfree United States
Sandra Luxton Australia
Sanghamitra Bhattacharyya India
Jon Entine relative to Stephen M. Brown United States Stephen M. Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Stephen M. Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Entine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Entine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Entine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Entine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Entine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Entine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Entine. The network helps show where Jon Entine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jon Entine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Entine Line = papers co-authored together Jon Entine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2003147
2
Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports And Why We're Afraid To Talk About It
2000118
3 202194
4 202120
5 199410
6
Let Them Eat Precaution
20057
7
Pension Fund Politics: The Dangers of Socially Responsible Investing
20055
8 20001
9 20001
10 20011

About Jon Entine

Jon Entine is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 10 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (2 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (1 paper), Humor Studies and Applications (1 paper), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (1 paper), Transgenic Plants and Applications (1 paper), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (1 paper) and Community Development and Social Impact (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (130 citations), Marketing (69 citations), Gender Studies (67 citations), Business and International Management (8 citations) and Accounting (44 citations). Jon Entine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Drew L. Kershen, Carl M. Ramage, Stuart J. Smyth, Alan McHughen, Wayne A. Parrott, Ryo Ohsawa, Martín A. Lema, Inez H. Slamet‐Loedin, Diane Wray‐Cahen and Maria Sueli Soares Felipe. Their work appears in journals such as Transgenic Research, Organization & Environment, Scientific American, Human Biology and Index on Censorship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact