Stuart J. Smyth

126 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Stuart J. Smyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Business and International Management 120
  • Plant Science 1.5k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 214
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 236
  • Biotechnology 187
Replace Peter W.B. Phillips with:
Peter W.B. Phillips Canada
Carl E. Pray United States
Matty Demont Philippines
Peter Barfoot
José Benjamin Falck‐Zepeda United States
Fangbin Qiao China
Jorge Fernandez‐Cornejo United States
GianCarlo Moschini United States
G. D. Graff United States
Éric Tollens Belgium
Stuart J. Smyth relative to Peter W.B. Phillips Canada Peter W.B. Phillips's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter W.B. Phillips · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart J. Smyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart J. Smyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart J. Smyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart J. Smyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart J. Smyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart J. Smyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart J. Smyth. The network helps show where Stuart J. Smyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart J. Smyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart J. Smyth Line = papers co-authored together Stuart J. Smyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 135 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202194
2 201885
3 200769
4 200267
5 202160
6 201956
7 201655
8 199248
9 202146
10 200244
11 201943
12 201843
13 199342
14 201742
15 201841
16 201341
17 201538
18 202138
19 201937
20 201137

About Stuart J. Smyth

Stuart J. Smyth is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Management of Technology and Innovation, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 135 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetically Modified Organisms Research (90 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (50 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (33 papers), Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development (19 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (17 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (12 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (9 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (120 citations), Plant Science (1.5k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (214 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (236 citations) and Biotechnology (187 citations). Stuart J. Smyth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter W.B. Phillips, Rim Lassoued, Hayley Hesseln, Alan McHughen, William A. Kerr, Diego Maximiliano Macall, David Castle, José Benjamin Falck‐Zepeda, Drew L. Kershen and George G. Khachatourians. Their work appears in journals such as GM crops & food, Trends in biotechnology, Sustainability, Transgenic Research and Plant Biotechnology Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact