Countries where authors publish in Transgenic Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Transgenic Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Transgenic Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transgenic Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Transgenic Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Transgenic Research.
About Transgenic Research
The 2.1k papers published in Transgenic Research in the last decades have received a total of 62.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Transgenic Research usually cover Biotechnology (482 papers), Genetics (691 papers), Molecular Biology (1.7k papers), Plant Science (857 papers) and Insect Science (108 papers) specifically the topics of CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (711 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (578 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (521 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (447 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (260 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (206 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (203 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (186 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Transgenic Research are Alan H. Christensen, Peter H. Quail, Björn E. Clausen, Walter Reith, Rainer Renkawitz, Christoph Burkhardt, Irmgard Förster, Elizabeth E. Hood, Stanton B. Gelvin and André Hoekema.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.