John Williams
Impact in
-
- Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Papers in
- Philosophy 38
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 32
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 27
- Co-authors
- Wee Liang Tan (2 shared papers)C.A. Elvehjem (21 shared papers)Gerald Litwack (7 shared papers)C. A. Elvehjem (6 shared papers)Eric W. K. Tsang (3 shared papers)James W. Bothwell (7 shared papers)Mitchell S. Green (3 shared papers)P. G. Tulpule (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (36 papers)Experimental Biology and Medicine (17 papers)Analysis (10 papers)Journal of Nutrition (7 papers)Synthese (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John Williams
131 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
- Business and International Management 105
- Philosophy 332
- Clinical Biochemistry 180
- Management of Technology and Innovation 188
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 266
Countries citing papers authored by John Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of John Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Williams. The network helps show where John Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 143 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 231 | |
| 2 | 1953 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 79 | |
| 4 | 1955 | 50 | |
| 5 | Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person | 2007 | 47 |
| 6 | 2008 | 46 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 42 | |
| 8 | 1956 | 40 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 36 | |
| 10 | 1951 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 32 | |
| 12 | 1952 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1952 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1955 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 16 | 1951 | 27 | |
| 17 | 1951 | 25 | |
| 18 | 1952 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 21 |
About John Williams
John Williams is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 143 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (32 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (27 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (19 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (9 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers) and Enzyme function and inhibition (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (105 citations), Philosophy (332 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (180 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (188 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (266 citations). John Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wee Liang Tan, C.A. Elvehjem, Gerald Litwack, C. A. Elvehjem, Eric W. K. Tsang, James W. Bothwell, Mitchell S. Green, P. G. Tulpule, David D. Gilboe and Philip Feigelson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Analysis, Journal of Nutrition and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.