Mitchell S. Green

1.2k citations
35 papers · 627 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell S. Green

31 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Mitchell S. Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Philosophy 335
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 305
  • Language and Linguistics 173
  • History and Philosophy of Science 72
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 135
Replace Robin Jeshion with:
Robin Jeshion United States
Anne Bezuidenhout United States
Stephen Neale United States
Charles Travis United Kingdom
Bede Rundle United Kingdom
Manuel García‐Carpintero Spain
Mark Richard United States
Danièle Moyal‐Sharrock United Kingdom
Timothy Sundell United States
Stefano Predelli United Kingdom
Mitchell S. Green relative to Robin Jeshion United States Robin Jeshion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Robin Jeshion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell S. Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell S. Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell S. Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell S. Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell S. Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell S. Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell S. Green. The network helps show where Mitchell S. Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell S. Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell S. Green Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell S. Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007136
2 200065
3 199565
4
Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person
200753
5 200949
6 199536
7 199832
8 201326
9 201724
10 199918
11 200714
12 201013
13 200013
14 199412
15 200711
16 20189
17 20168
18 20027
19 19995
20 19995

About Mitchell S. Green

Mitchell S. Green is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (335 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (305 citations), Language and Linguistics (173 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (72 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (135 citations). Mitchell S. Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include John Williams, Michael Dummett, Christopher Hitchcock, Cristina Bicchieri, Gernot Münster, Michael Schmitt, Joseph G. Moore, Mario Livio and Kim Joris Boström. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Acta Analytica, Linguistics and Philosophy, Synthese and Mind & Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact