Mitchell S. Green

1.0k citations
22 papers · 426 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mitchell S. Green

22 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Mitchell S. Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Philosophy 235
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 210
  • Language and Linguistics 123
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 112
Replace Jane Heal with:
Jane Heal United Kingdom
Kathrin Glüer Sweden
Anne Bezuidenhout United States
Gerhard Preyer Germany
Bede Rundle United Kingdom
Timothy Sundell United States
Robin Jeshion United States
Manuel García‐Carpintero Spain
Stefano Predelli United Kingdom
Åsa Wikforss Sweden
Mitchell S. Green relative to Jane Heal United Kingdom Jane Heal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Jane Heal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell S. Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell S. Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell S. Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell S. Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell S. Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell S. Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell S. Green. The network helps show where Mitchell S. Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell S. Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell S. Green Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell S. Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007112
2 200054
3
Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person
200746
4 200939
5 199530
6 199828
7 199918
8 201715
9 200714
10 200011
11 201011
12 200710
13 19948
14 20187
15 20027
16 19994
17 19993
18 20102
19
Introduction to Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality and the First Person
20072
20 20172

About Mitchell S. Green

Mitchell S. Green is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Language and Linguistics and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (235 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (210 citations), Language and Linguistics (123 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations). Mitchell S. Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include John Williams and Christopher Hitchcock. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Linguistics and Philosophy, Acta Analytica, Synthese and Mind & Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact