John Wells

31 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

John Wells
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Animal Science and Zoology 279
  • Biotechnology 226
  • Food Science 361
  • Biochemistry 84
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 92
Replace M. C. Pandey with:
M. C. Pandey India
Grith Mortensen Denmark
Asaad R. Al‐Hilphy Iraq
Rodrigo Melgosa Spain
Kyriaki G. Zinoviadou Greece
T. P. LABUZA United States
Weiqiang Yan China
Anne-Lucie Raoult-Wack France
Hafida Wahia China
Nikolaos G. Stoforos Greece
John Wells relative to M. C. Pandey India M. C. Pandey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. C. Pandey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Wells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Wells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wells. The network helps show where John Wells may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Wells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Wells Line = papers co-authored together John Wells links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996129
2 2000105
3 1997105
4 199496
5 199154
6 199842
7 199233
8 199531
9 198829
10 198828
11 198727
12 198924
13 200323
14 201418
15 198517
16 199516
17 198815
18 198714
19 198513
20
Utilization of rice bran and oil in human diets
199313

About John Wells

John Wells is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Biotechnology, Plant Science and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 876 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (7 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (5 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (4 papers), Food Drying and Modeling (4 papers), Food Supply Chain Traceability (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers) and Freezing and Crystallization Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (279 citations), Biotechnology (226 citations), Food Science (361 citations), Biochemistry (84 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (92 citations). John Wells has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Yanyun Zhao, J. Samuel Godber, R. Paul Singh, Weicheng Hu, Kenneth McMillin, Douglas L. Marshall, Jae W. Park, Edward Kolbe, R. Paul Singh and Linda Andrews. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Food Science, Journal of Food Process Engineering, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, Food Microbiology and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact